Skip to main content

History and what the future might think of the world of today

Read or watch the media about the elections in France or the soon-to-be elections in Britain. Cast your mind back to the U.S. and the coming of President Trump, or if you’re in India trace every news article on Prime Minister Modi.

Fake news, left and alt-right media notwithstanding, for a student and analyst of history it’s all fascinating. And scary! From the points the media makes, no matter which end of the extreme (or even perhaps dead centre) that you believe in, there are subtle sub-texts to be understood, interpreted and applied. They go unapplied as historians of the future may well conclude!

At one level, if the media reflects what we are that reflection is truly disturbing. If Trump is an indication, the reflection we see for ourselves is “Mirror, mirror on the wall, who’s the most beautiful of them all”. And in some senses this is about ignorant, shallow vanity, even narcissism, which in its own way can be dangerously destructive. Yet if some sanity around prevails, it can be overcome.

If the indication is Le Pen, Bannon or the tragicomedy of Brexit and Farrage, then the reflection is Dorian Gray. Cover the mirror, think of yourself eternal, until you’re forced to look at the reality of your reflection. And then face the finiteness of reality… with the immaturity of it all.

Or worse still, the reflection is a duality of both “Mirror, mirror…” and Dorian Gray.

The nature of media today, across its extremes whether left, conservative, alt-right, corporate-agenda-driven, etc., leads it to make the instant moment the imperative time to interpret everything, as one would interpret history. And interpret everything as not just history in the making but the history of the past. For thanks to the power of the instantaneous digital, every moment, is a history past. And every moment has the chance to influence our thoughts in ways that allow little true consideration, reducing our minds to an almost primeval level.

The lessons of this instantaneous history are often sub-texts, subtle and hard to decipher, for every moment reflected in the media is living, yet promptly past, each to be really understood not in itself but in a context of the continuity of time— past, present and future.

The media looks at the singularity of the moment and offers explanations either promptly or as a few moments go by, struggling at each phase to offer elucidations based on whatever lens it employs, whichever audience it caters to or whoever pays it for eyeballs.

These explanations of the singularity of the moment through one specific lens are dangerous for they only serve to influence and reinforce beliefs, false or otherwise. They do nothing to expand the canvas of our understanding and knowledge nor do they empower us to obtain new lenses to clarify and widen the scope of our vision.

The immediacy of the moment offers explanations that analysed in themselves seem truisms. Yet analysed in the longue duree through the continuity of time through the past, the present and the future they are truly disturbing, as one may conclude from the events in the U.S., France or Britain or, perhaps, even India.

Deeper analysis of this phenomenon by historians of the future may well lead them to conclude that our world, struggling with its ability to cope with technological disruption in media, was one of raw superficiality, driven by the short-sighted, emotional, intellectually ignorant and ill-equipped, often sadly refuting wisdom gained by generations previous.

They may conclude that humankind of the second decade of the 21st century with its inability to cope had retreated into a past, perhaps akin to a Stone Age. The men and women were always emotionally and factually needy since the economic, social and psychological systems they employed were incapable of delivering both goods and the happiness they sought. Leave aside the philosophical!

This humankind had leaders, they may assume, who remained fundamentally greedy for power and needy of goods, recognition and adulation! Their leaders were reflections of their society. Of the men and women who chose them to high office!

It's a world that will seem akin to what we believe the Middle Ages or even the Stone Age to be, from our lens of our present, frightening and confusing. All the more frightening, given that human kind seemed to struggle with the disruption caused by the very technology it invented and the consequences of its own actions like the quest for globalisation, economic freedom and even climate change! A disruption of everything that humankind had come to accept as familiar and comfortable, a pace of change through the industrial revolution in its various forms that once seemed acceptable to cope with!

To the historians of the future, it may well seem that this was a consequence of the lack of true leadership. For the so-called leaders, themselves, lacked the ability to link through the continuity of time, leaving them and their followers intellectually, emotionally and morally stunted remnants of a past, long gone past. These leaders lacked both capability and knowledge. They were ignorant of the need to look at the longue duree… ignorant of ignorance itself!

These humans, the historians of the future may argue, were incapable of understanding that their problem was interpreting everything through the singularity of the moment, which in turn warped their minds, through lenses that were worse flawed by ignorance. Their minds were either incapable of understanding what the emerging world needed or they deliberately chose not to recognise it, given their short-sightedness which in turn was exacerbated by their needy and greedy tendencies.

They lacked, future historians may conclude, maturity-- the kind of maturity that empowered the ability to be open and holistic, to understand the interconnectedness of everything on Earth through the ceaseless continuity of time, the remorseless eventuality of the far-reaching consequences of each action on the present and the future, the ceaselessly dynamic complexity of perennially consequence-driven continuity in the systems that made and will always make humankind.

We, who once exhibited the traits of maturity in a post-World War II world to craft a peace and a system that no matter what its flaws, (and contextual though they might be), served reasonably for a time, will be condemned for our inability to exhibit similar maturity and thinking to craft a new system called for by the present. One based on what we know now; the knowledge that there will always be consequences for the future!

We will be condemned by the generations of the future! 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Interconnected stakeholders multiply the impact to both Sustainability & Reputation risk on earnings and marketcap

In an interconnected world Sustainability and Reputation risks are inseparable. It’s been nearly 18 months since the industry certification body, the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) suspended the palm oil producer, IOI Corporation Berhard, for illegally clearing 11,750 hectares of forests and peatland in Indonesia. The problems for IOI started when an NGO, Aidenvironment, alleged that the company’s subsidiaries in West Kalimantan, Indonesia, had illegaly deforested 11,750 hectares including a 1,300 hectares plot inside the Manis Mata Production Forest, a conservation area. In most cases Aidenvironment, alleged that the required government permits were lacking. ÏOI was then quickly suspended from RSPO. Promptly, as Ceres pointed out, 27 of IOI’s largest customers, including ADM, Colgate-Palmolive, Johnson & Johnson, Kellogg Company, Nestle, Procter & Gamble, Reckitt Benckiser and Unilever, suspended procurement contracts. Next, as Valuewalk’s Gabrie...

With Stakeholder activism on the rise, ‘pre-emptive strike’ research and precision strategy are critical

When a shareholder turns activist, corporate Boards go into overdrive trying to fend off potential actions. And when it comes to Reputation, Boards and CEOs get their PR machinery into overdrive.  But shareholders no longer act alone. For embedded within the activist shareholder’s demands is the idea that corporate reputations are always susceptible to reputation (and potential financial) damage and consequent impacts whether in the capital markets, or among policy makers or communities. Any shareholder action draws in diverse sets of other stakeholders, whether customers, communities or even NGOs. Sometimes the action draws policymakers into focus. Complexity abounds. How effective is a traditional corporate strategy in today’s age of instantaneous social media echo chambers? Is it at all possible for managements to create ‘pre-emptive strikes’ on potential issues that activist shareholders might raise? Or is it simply a matter of getting ‘bots’ to counter-attack in ...

With Stakeholder activism on the rise, ‘pre-emptive strike’ research and precision strategy are critical

When a shareholder turns activist, corporate Boards go into overdrive trying to fend off potential actions. And when it comes to Reputation, Boards and CEOs get their PR machinery into overdrive. But shareholders no longer act alone. For embedded within the activist shareholder’s demands is the idea that corporate reputations are always susceptible to reputation (and potential financial) damage and consequent impacts whether in the capital markets, or among policy makers or communities. Any shareholder action draws in diverse sets of other stakeholders, whether customers, communities or even NGOs. Sometimes the action draws policymakers into focus. Complexity abounds. How effective is a traditional corporate strategy in today’s age of instantaneous social media echo chambers? Is it at all possible for managements to create ‘pre-emptive strikes’ on potential issues that activist shareholders might raise? Or is it simply a matter of getting ‘bots’ to counter-attack in social med...